Cookies: We are sorry we can’t show you this video – as matter of your Cookies preferences. Accept here the Targeting Cookies to watch the video content.
Cookies: We are sorry we can’t show you this video – as matter of your Cookies preferences. Accept here the Targeting Cookies to watch the video content.
Many individuals at high risk for lung cancer are often unaware of the potential benefits of screening or may face barriers such as cost, accessibility, or fear of the screening process.
Workflow issues, such as managing the influx of screening participants and ensuring timely communication of results, can be a significant burden. Moreover, the repetitive nature of interpreting numerous lung scans can be mentally draining and lead to a loss of enthusiasm.
Screening participants are typically exposed to repeated CT scans which raises concerns around radiation dose. Lung cancer screening when performed without efficient CT hardware and image reconstruction algorithms, may yield inconclusive or false positive results, leading to additional and costly follow-up procedures, while causing anxiety and stress for patients.
Cost-effectiveness of the program requires a careful balance of the investments in equipment and staff, training, and the number of diagnostic and downstream follow-up procedures versus the benefits of improved health outcomes and less spending on costly therapies in the long-run.
Latest insights on addressing challenges
Lung Cancer Screening (LCS) saves lives, but more people need to get screened.
Get the big picture on challenges faced in screening and practical solutions in just one glance.
© CANON MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORPORATION
© CANON MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORPORATION
The site you see is the Canon Medical Global website. If you choose region / language, we will link to each regional site.